Was Mary A Virgin? [VIDEO]

WasMary

“We can determine with certainty that the virgin Mary was, in fact, not a virgin,” wrote one self-declared atheist. His was one of many blog posts and articles I found debunking the “myth” of Mary’s miraculous conception. Admittedly, some of the articles I read on this topic were written by respected religious scholars… even those published in Pulitzer Prize winning journals. A Christian pursuing an intelligent faith simply must stop to consider how incredibly ludicrous it is to believe that Jesus was born of a virgin. Yes, I said “ludicrous!” Fact: it’s not scientifically possible for a virgin to give birth.  If the hair on the back of your neck is standing on end, relax. I’m going to offer you some intelligent faith-food to defend Mary’s virtue. Here are two fallacies unbelievers and even believers are embracing as evidence that Mary was not a virgin, and the logic to debunk them.

1.) The virgin birth was a great cover up. Mary was just another teen pregnancy with a highly creative way of getting away with it! She wouldn’t be the only one to attempt this scam. Last year the Daily Beast reported 45 “virgin births” according to a North Carolina study.  We won’t get into the messy details, but there’s a smoking gun found in this study that tells us girls who think they’re supposed to be virgins when they wed are a little more likely to go to drastic measures when they play the great cover up game. Here it is: “The virgins who reported pregnancies were more likely to have pledged chastity (30 percent) than non-virgins who reported pregnancies (15 percent).” How much pressure was Mary under back-in-the-day than these girls who’d obviously loosened their chastity belts at least once? I can see where a person of unbelief might be energized by this rumor mill, but a Christian cannot embrace it.

Believing that the virgin birth was a cover up requires us to reject both the deity of Christ and the salvation of our souls along with Mary’s big, round rumor. We must throw this baby out with the dirty bath water. And most people of faith do.

2.) Faulty translations created the myth of a virgin birth. Some religious scholars argue that the language used in the Scriptures implies that Mary was pre-pubescent. They argue that it is possible that Mary was not yet menstruating, but the miracle would be that the Holy Spirit would enable her body to become pregnant anyway. (So, I guess they’re going for half a miracle here. But let’s go with it, shall we?)

We must admit that the language is complex in some places. For example, the prophetic passage in Isaiah 7:14 declaring Christ’s birth would be to an almah, which can sometimes be translated as a young woman not yet sexually mature. Here’s where believers jump on the bandwagon of doubt to make Christ’s birth a little more “believable” to the masses and perhaps even themselves. But don’t be too quick to join them.

Here’s what’s wrong with this argument: the whole context of Scripture eliminates the confusion.

Almah could be used for either a young woman not sexually mature, or to refer to a sexually mature woman who was a virgin. A closer look finds that we can pinpoint which one is meant in Isaiah based on other references to Mary’s sexual status. Luke 1:27 declares Mary was a parthenos, or virgin. Mary herself refers to her virginity, having not “known” (ginosko*) a man. (Luke 1:34) And the clincher is a verse that refers to Joseph:

“But he did not have sexual relations with her until her son was born. And Joseph named him Jesus.” (Matthew 1:25) The Scriptures clearly state that the birth of Christ involved only one innocent young virgin and the power of the Holy Spirit. No man was used in the making of the Son of God. The question of Mary’s virginity is not about Mary at all, but about the authority of the Scriptures. And if you throw this out, of what value is the rest of God’s word?

This argument is critical. Deep theological truths about Christ rely on his miraculous conception. Jesus was fully human (Hebrews 2:14) and fully God (John 1:1; Colossians 2:9). For this to occur, did he not need both a human mother and a Divine Father? As C.S. Lewis once wrote:

“When you beget, you beget something of the same kind as yourself. A man begets human babies, a beaver begets little beavers, and a bird begets eggs which turn into little birds” (Beyond Personality, 1948, p. 5).

When God the Father “begets” Jesus, he “begets” God. This truth about Christ’s birth is critical to the good news of Christ’s even more miraculous death and resurrection. Just as his birth is worth nothing without the miracle of Mary’s virginity, so his death has no value without the miracle of defying it. And the good news is that even in this so-called post-Christian era, 73% of American’s still believe in the virgin birth according to Huffington Post.

I’m not really worried when the atheists of this world try to explain away the miracles of Christmas. It’s the believers who try to make sense of it all that concern me. If we explain away Christ’s birth, how long will it be until we begin to release the miracle of his death? Though we can be intelligent and use great reasoning as we defend our beliefs, faith cannot rely on physical science to prove efficacious for our souls. When I really think about it—as intelligent as I want my faith to be—it doesn’t make sense. It’s a tad ludicrous.

Christ’s arrival as a helpless baby in the smelly animal shelter is a very strange way to save the world.

*Ginosko is the Greek form of yada (to know, to be known, to be fully respected) used as early as Genesis 4:1 to refer to holy, marital sexual oneness. From Genesis to Revelation we can trace this powerful word (and I did in What Are You Waiting For: The One Thing No One Ever Tells You About Sex) to see the fuller picture of sexuality in the gospel.

Written By
More from Dannah

Single Girl, Pick Your Fight! [VIDEO]

Dear Single Girl: You have a battle ahead. To live a life...
Read More

6 Comments

  • I like how scientifically impossible it all is. It’s more interesting having to believe than having all kinds of proof.

    Hi Ms. Dannah, I have an unrelated question and it would mean a lot if you answered. Um, lately I’ve heard that any sin in your life puts up a wall so that God no longer hears your prayers. Is that true? I’ve made an effort to deal with some things but that’s actually not my question. My question is why do I feel like God wouldn’t want me? I struggle with depression and I’ve been trying to read my Bible more but I keep thinking that he doesn’t want me. I don’t think I’m condemning myself. I just keep thinking that. Like He doesn’t want a mess of a girl. I want to get all this straight before I drift too far away. Then I feel even more guilty about not understanding something so simple. Anyway, sorry for all the different subjects in my comment. God bless.

    • Hi Genevieve. Often unhealthy emotions (like depression) are a sign that we are believing untruthful things about ourselves, our lives, our purpose, or even God. You actually wrote a lie write in your comment: “God wouldn’t want me.” That is a lie. Oh, he does. But your heart believes it the lie. Depression can also be medical, so I would encourage you to talk to someone and perhaps see a doctor. My preference is always to treat it both spiritually and medically. (And sometimes medically, we have to change the way we live…eating differently, exercising.) But that said, I have a great tool for you and I’ll send you a copy if you email my assistant eileen@purefreedom.org. Tell her I said we would send you “lies young women believe.” It will help you!

  • Hi! Mrs. Gresh I’m glad for this blog post. For me, as a believer I still believe that Virtue is the issue. God is good. It wouldn’t be a threat for them not to explain such thing just to nullify it because we know God is good and He’s bringing good out of it. Rejecting that fact would be to reject all truth in the Bible. And If they believe there is a God then they should believe that God can do the impossible. And what about of Joseph? It is not only Mary playing her part here, Joseph was attentive to God’s instruction too. Faith to hope there is something that we haven’t yet discover. RESPECT for God because He loves us and our utter cry for REDEMPTION (which he really wants for us to know – depths of His love) matters. Left by ourselves, we’ll be like beast.

  • One of my big concerns is how we teach the virgin birth to children. When teaching children at church, Bible study, or even a school, how do you recommend we explain the virgin birth? I have not come up with an accurate way that respects their lack of knowledge when it isn’t my place to teach that. We cannot say she was unmarried…that is not so unusual these days. I would love your input.

    • When a child is old enough to begin to ask about it, it is probably time to begin to explain it. Generally, they don’t have a curiosity about that word until the time is right for them to mentally digest the meaning. The early you introduce truth about sexuality to them, the less time the world has to introduce lies and false meaning. I’m not saying you tell a 4 year old, but if an 8 or 9 year old is asking…it’s time to tell them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.